
All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Acrylic on Canvas, 2002, 30×40
All modern Americans shop / I see them gathered in parking lots / like flocks of gulls / so busy being fed

All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Acrylic on Canvas, 2002, 30×40
All modern Americans shop / I see them gathered in parking lots / like flocks of gulls / so busy being fed

All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Acrylic on Canvas, 2006, 30×40
Two corner me / not One Corner Ma / the original inspirations / continue, unheeding.

All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Acrylic on watercolor paper, 1998, 18×24
If a sunlit day can be ugly / this was an ugly day / wind cold and promise of worse / that guy needs solitude, beauty or cash / real bad

Like ” wrong”, beauty is one of those concepts that can never be simply defined. It depends not only on environmental and cultural factors but also on the mood of the observer. We can often agree, but almost as often argue with others and even with ourselves .
It’s fairly safe to say that even considering beauty requires a sense of security within the observer _ you can hardly appreciate the loveliness of a forest while being chased by a bear. . Whether something is beautiful or not occurs way down on the scale of evolutionary fight or flight. A great deal of the time, most of us hardly notice it at all .
We assume that – like other odd traits – there must be SOME biological reason we can respond to beauty. Perhaps it helps social solidarity. Perhaps it is a shortcut to relaxation. Certainly nothing obvious .
I have noticed that in my own life the idea of beautiful has evolved as I age. When young, it was primarily biological. When older, mostly cultural. And now, in an elder, much more simply appreciation of all that is and how it fits together. A miraculous and – yes – extremely beautiful universe .
At least when I am happy, secure, and not doing too much .

All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Acrylic on Canvas, 1971, 28×36
Joanne in Kansas City

My wife usually gets her hair “done” in a salon,. When she gets home, there are inevitable complaints that it “looks different”. Of course – the lighting is changed .
There have always been different light effects – sunset, noon, overcast. And artificial from candles, gas jet, incandescent. In the era of LED, any “temperature” of red or blue or green or yellow mixture can be served up, bright or dim .
We deal with all this amazingly well. Red usually looks red. A landscape picture resembles itself in almost all conditions. But that should indicate to us just how amazing our vision is – both raw data gathering and interpretation .
Painters always knew this. Patrons who bought things done under “Northern light exposure” in studios rarely hung their purchases under similar conditions. Poor artists’ dimly lit barns had different lighting then when the work is hung in a brightly illuminated museum. And forget trying to recreate the conditions of “plein aire” .
My lesson is that much of our life is like this. We may think things are exactly the same, but only because our brains automatically adjust to what are objectively quite different events. It’s part of our amazing ability to compose and generalize, the core of our knowledge.
Not quite obvious, and easy to ignore. Until the hair looks entirely different …

All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Acrylic on Canvas, 1976, 40×48
Boston Public Garden in Winter

All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Acrylic on Canvas, 2000, 30×40
Dark clouds attracted me / white gull startled me / insistent wind endlessly / gusted towards tomorrow

All paintings at: https://sites.google.com/view/cabinetofvanities
Pastel and Ink on Mulberry Paper, 2025, 11×15
Years ago / Weeds were high / I could hide behind / A beautiful screen

A primary goal in any art form is to select the limits of the work and communicate them to an imagined audience. A pencil sketch is different from an oil canvas. A tonal study has criteria which do not much resemble hard outlines . How well the final work succeeds is based on the selection of limits, the communication of these limits, and the impact of the finished product within its declared and accepted boundaries .
I think this is why we find children’s or “primitive” or amateur work so charming. We accept the basic proposition and enjoy the creation. No need to compare your child’s work to the Sistine chapel. “Grandma Moses” even finds a place in fine art museums .
We live, however, in an age of imagined limitlessness. Artists often refuse to accept any limits, and the result is a mess, whether a dinner or a sculpture or a book. Other artists rebel and set artificially narrow bounds which, even if successfully executed, are quite boring once the initial shock wears off .
So I happily say to myself “this and not that”, or “that’s enough”. My art is more satisfying for so doing. And I pretty much feel the same way about life in general .