When the United States was founded 250 years ago, it took three or four days for the fastest message to travel from Boston to Philadelphia. Current print and cable journalists seem to believe the same rules are in effect now. Or so I gather from the consensus that “90 days” is a “frantic whirlwind” for a political campaign .
The saying used to be that “a lie can travel around the world before truth can get its boots on.” Now a meme can “go viral” almost before it is created. A gigantic news sheet in 1795 had maybe a hundred local readers. An internet post instantly informs millions or even billions. A day is an eternity.
In those olden days, the world had very little, very delayed, effects. Crossing the Atlantic could take a month or so, most remote happenings were of no relevance whatsoever. New markets crash now at bank news from Japan, and the entire planet can be incinerated in an hour or so, at the whim of any angry old fart who feels particularly cranky .
In that context 90 days is far longer than most news cycles ever were. People “meet” candidates in minutes on media. A true whirlwind might be 9 days. But then what would all the writers and talking heads have to talk about ?
I’m afraid that this is symptomatic of the endless cynicism I’ve developed about just about every political discussion lately. What “they” say doesn’t quite match my own reality, in distance, speed, or effect
HuntingtonHarborThoughts 